TNAG-2699-FCO40-3905-Hong-Kong-Civil-Service-appointments-and-promotions-1993 — Page 56

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

Reference

have been in my opinion fair. But it is also true to say there are quite a number of youngish Chinese whom some expats would consider have been given accelerated promotion.

6.

I suggest that we should make clear that we wish Hong Kong to continue its existing practice as for the most senior posts and let us see their five year forecast. My view is that we should not push this one with Hong Kong. Are we really in the business of trying to tell Hong Kong whom it should promote? The answer is surely no: our interests, as far as it goes, is to watch the trends. If we see that Hong Kong appear to be favouring one group over another then we might wish to discuss the issue.

Milt ufetze

M V Stone

Hong Kong Department

WH 304

270 2651

10 February 1992

cc: Miss Brooks

Legal Advisers

If Hong Kong are satisfied that Peking wd not expect the Chief Executive to read the BL as

requiring him to to feking nominate trepart for appointment

1 for appointment such long-term acting

appointees as Severanes, so be it. better to tidy things up now

1997.

Otherwise it wd be rather than risk arguments after

CODE 18-77

TICAET

حمله

10:

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.