30.
0193, 09:43
2071 583 9289
2 BARE COURT
29.
21.
CONFIDENTIAL
BUBUL
2018/019
to-local people. (save where there
able if,
salternative). But II, in pursuance of this Regulations were to impose (for no good reason?
-persons who are, for general purposes
permanent residents
the policy. MOULGI
oL Trong Kong,
:
an.
I am concerned about the policy of not permitting officar originally engaged on overseas contract terms subsequently to change to local contract or pensionable terms. My concern is that it would breach Article 21 if this policy were applied even in respect of an officer who was, at the date when he applies so to change, a permanent resident of Hong Kong. If he is such a permanent resident,
L
This difficulty would
be .
resolved by the amendment which I propose in paragraph 25 above.
As to the policy of appointing children of overseas officers/expatriate
employees
on
overseas
terms irrespective of the merits of the case or the wishes of the candidate concerned, this seems to me very difficult to justify under Article 21. Many of those disadvantaged in this respect will be permanent residents of Hong Kong. Again, I can see no "reasonable" justification for a policy
16
CONFIDENTIAL
NMR HAMAS
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.