TNAG-2654-FCO40-3847-Extradition-cases-from-the-UK-and-France-to-Hong-Kong-Lorrai-1992 — Page 154

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

ASSN

A

It is not sufficient for him to show that the Hong

Kong Government had or could obtain access to material

which it could have made available to him but did not do

so, unless the failure to disclose the material was

motivated by a lack of good faith in the interests of

justice.

B

C

D

E

F

ملا

G

H.

Are there representations on which Mr. Osman is entitled to rely?

It was suggested that it had been represented to the

applicant that the Hong Kong Government indicated that in

relation to the committal proceedings before the Chief

Stipendiary Magistrate, the Hong Kong Government would comply

with the Attorney-General's guidance.

representation to this effect was made.

In fact no

What was represented

was that in the proceedings in Hong Kong, there would be

compliance with the guidance. The remaining matters on which

reliance is placed, are all connected with the attempts of the

applicant to obtain inspection of documents in the possession of

During the committal proceedings Mr. Nicholls caused

B.B.M.B.

a telex to be sent to Hong Kong which contained arguments in

favour of disclosure being given by B.B.M.B. That telex

referred to observations of the Chief Stipendiary Magistrate

which stressed the desirability of this happening.

Subsequently in the proceedings which took place in Malaya an

order was made by the High Court of Malaya granting extensive

inspection. However, the bank was not prepared to allow Mr.

Osman's legal advisers to inspect and the inspection had to be

carried out by counsel for the Hong Kong Government whose

decision as to materiality was to be final. This function was

22

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.