Mr Christie
Legal Advisers K 269
HKC 175/1
5
Reference.
60
R&R.
HONG KONG: SHIPPING REGISTER
1.
см
As you may be aware Dr Harkin has now left the Department and has handed over his work to me.
Consequently, we came across papers yesterday which were sent to you seeking views, dated 18 May. We have no evidence of a reply from you in our file register and since Ms Barrett has our file we still cannot tell if it has been put on.
2.
(26
Would it be possible for you to see if you did reply to the request. For ease of reference I attach the previous minutes.
RA JBut
RAJ Bunten
Hong Kong Department
WH 305 270 2655
23 July 1992
CODE 18-77
Mr. Banten,
com I
of a
record
inform that I have no reply to Dr. Karton's
Dr. Harlin's minute or
18 May 1982 which tself was chasing up
astite to Ms. Barrett doped 23 December
a
1991.
2. I ague with Dr. Kanlea's interpretatio of
King Kong's felno attached. Paragus 3 seems Кад to imply that Bukid authorities
Britia authorities could not
HK registered Camfully take action against a ship outside of ning kong waters which was nor flying the
Under internationa could. Unden they would.
Re red curryn. My view is that
пе
a shop would have
ship.RB.CM
3.
any
ليه سما
us nationdity, entitling
مد
state to desent modatio
Кия
over 1V.
that this question has been the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.