TNAG-2457-FCO40-3578-Future-of-Hong-Kong-constitutional-development-presentation-1992 — Page 9

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

02 DEC '92 11:10 M & CO 3 LOMBARD ST.

A

P.1/2

5

10

First it must be for Hong Kong's people to decide for

themselves how far they want to go in extending democracy pre-

1997. It is their future: and they have to live with China. They will certainly factor in Chinese views when they reach their

judgement.

Chris Patten's proposals are now being debated in Hong Kong. Some alternatives have already been put forward. Others

will likely emerge in the next few weeks. [Once everything is on

the table, Chris Patten will make his considered

recommendations. But it will be up to Hong Kong's Legislative Council, its parliament, to have the last word. It can accept,

reject or modify his ideas.

Second, since the Joint Declaration of 1984, Hong Kong's

future has been charted in consultation with China and by agreement with China. That agreement is needed now if people

are to have confidence in Hong Kong's futu

sture.]

While Britain is responsible for Hong Kong right up to 1997, we have prudently taken account of Beijing's views. Some call that kow-towing. But it's easy to be heroic from afar. The plain fact is that Hong Kong's future depends on China and any constitutional change worth having requires China's assent if it is

to survive after 1997.

97.] The quicker

Lan

are ce gel back lo

Sensible discussion mit Chine about Mary Long's future, the tetter.

Page

Page

Page

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.