SECRET
13.
-6-
Among the various proposals which have been
canvassed there only seem to me to be two which are
credible
<<
first, a coalition ExCo, or second, complete
separation of Exco and LegCo.
14.
The coalition approach was to some degree
attempted after the 1991 LegCo elections. It failed to
get fully off the ground because, maybe understandably,
confidentiality and collective responsibility were too
onerous a burden for some of the potential joint
members. And for those LegCo members who did join the
Executive Council, the responsibilities of having to
stand up for government policies at a time when they were
competing for community support to found a political
party proved onerous.
15.
Besides these practical political difficulties,
there is also an important constitutional objection to
the coalition approach. In my judgement, it would retard
the development of the Legislature. A coalition ExCo.
would result in the transfer of political debate from the
open forum of LegCo to the closed council of ExCo. This
would run counter to our plans for strengthening the
accountability of government. In addition, a coalition
ExCo implies the appointment of people who have already
been appointed to LegCo. It is no disrespect to those
who have already served on ExCo with such distinction to
SECRET
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.