1992-12-04 18:57 COMMS OFFICE (GOUT HOUSE)
852 526 0995 P.11
THE
HAVE BEEN MADE BEFORE THE LEGISLATION IS ACTUALLY DRAFTED
DRAFTING PROCESS HAS FINISHED. DO YOU HAVE A SITUATION WHERE YOU ARE
WILLING TO CONSIDER SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO ANY OF THE PRINCIPAL
PROPOSALS THAT YOU HAVE MADE AND I REALLY REFER TO THE TWO WHICH ARE
CAUSING THE GREATEST SINGLE CONCERN IN HONG KONG, AND IN CHINA ARE
YOU IN A SITUATION, WHERE THE GOVERNMENT IS WILLING TO DISCUSS WITH
THIS COUNCIL BEFORE LEGISLATION GOES FORWARD, IS DRAFTED, CHANGES
WHICH MIGHT BE MADE TO THE PRINCIPAL PROPOSALS?
GOVERNOR: THERE ARE TWO POINTS TO THAT QUESTION. FIRST OF ALL THE
HONOURABLE MEMBER IS, I THINK, ENTIRELY RIGHT IN SAYING THAT OF THE
SEVEN PROPOSALS THAT I PUT IN MY LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL SPEECH IN EARLY
OCTOBER, CONTROVERSY FOCUSES PRINCIPALLY ON TWO. AND I WOULD HAVE
THOUGHT THAT EVEN THOUGH THERE WOULD BE ARGUMENT IN THE COUNCIL ABOUT
SOME OF THE OTHERS, AS THERE HAS BEEN IN THE PAST, THAT THAT ARGUMENT
WOULD BE HOW CAN I PUT IT?
EASILY CONTAINED WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF
DECORUM.
AS FOR THE OTHER TWO PROPOSALS, I CAN ONLY REPEAT WHAT I'VE
SAID EARLIER, IF PROPOSALS COME FORWARD FROM THIS COUNCIL, OR IF
PROPOSALS COME FORWARD FROM ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE COMMUNITY, WHICH IN
MY JUDGMENT, AND IN THE COUNCIL'S, ARE MORE FAIR, ARE BETTER, ARE
BASED ON BETTER PREMISES THAN THE PROPOSALS THAT I'VE MADE, I REMAIN
OPEN-MINDED AND I REMAIN READY TO CONSIDER THEM. IF I HADN'T BEEN IN
THAT STATE OF MIND, WHEN I SPOKE TO THE COUNCIL ON THE 7TH OCTOBER I
WOULD HAVE ANNOUNCED THE DECISIONS THAT
PROPOSALS THAT I WAS PROPOSING.
WAS MAKING, NOT THE
SO I HOPE THAT WITHOUT COMPLICATING
MATTERS TOO MUCH, THE POSITION IS CLEAR TO THE HONOURABLE MEMBER AND
TO OTHER HONOURABLE MEMBERS.
11
Page 30Page 31
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.