aefl.rw/docs/6.5.11
nature of our exercise that the main difficulty identified with
private sector input is a decline in Sterling against the HK$, but the Bank raises one means of covering this risk without resorting
together with to a government guarantee (ie a put option). This, the Bank's conclusion that the private sector avenue is worthy of further investigation, needs to be made clear in the paper.
paragraph: "and On Early Retirement, add at the end of the first HKG's policy to localise (especially senior) posts." Add at the end of the second paragraph: "Consideration might therefore be given to pressing with the HKG at an early opportunity the case for extending Early Retirement to HK HMOCs."
the first On Compensation, insert "full" before "traditional" in tiret under option B. The total cost of option D is £40 million
and not £43 million.
Finally, on SPOS, cost estimates of the amendment should be given, and the extent to which they relate to the different substantive options should also be indicated (eg SPOS would not be needed under option B, and would be reduced under option D).
I am copying this letter to Dave Fish at ODA.
Your, Kenn
KEVIN WOODFIELD
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.