TNAG-2429-FCO40-3531-Hong-Kong-Her-Majesty-s-Overseas-Civil-Service-(HMOCS)-poli-1993 — Page 129

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

T1

5

Treasury are not minded to offer a guarantee, but they may

consider subsidising the costs involved in a private sector

scheme. Mr Portillo may argue that more work needs to be done

on this option to obtain costings, and perhaps seek views from

a second financial institution.

(iii) On compensation, Mr Portillo may maintain that the

original proposal (Option A) is adequate when combined with a

sterling safeguard. However, he knows that we cannot

agree to this and will, I believe, accept that HMG's offer on

compensation should be revised to make it more attractive to

officers. He is likely to prefer Option D as its estimated cost of £40 million is £14 million less than Option C (our

preferred option).

(iv) Agree that changes should be made to the SPOS

regulations, but that they should be implemented as part of an agreed package of benefits.

4. Against this background, I recommend that our strategy

should be to narrow down the options as far as possible with a view to inviting OPD (K) to reach final decisions on a package.

Specifically, we should press Mr Portillo to agree that:

(i) HMG should provide a sterling safeguard along the lines of Option A (Fixed Trigger). As he will not agree to a level of 16:1, OPD (K) can be asked to decide on the appropriate trigger level.

sub.overs.civils.ADM

JEB

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.