if he is pensionable. But in view of Hong
Kong practice and the fact that we did provide for contingent applications for the Judges, and are apparently now prepared to allow contingent applications for the rest, so long as the latter actually transfer by 30th April, this paragraph may stand. But what if HK do not complete the "exercise" in time ?)
Para 12: It is difficult to reconcile the first sentence with paragraph 8. I think it should be deleted. Add at the end of line 8: "This gives them three months following their any application for membership of HMOCS see paragraph 8 above - made contingently on their being accepted for transfer to the
pensionable establishment. Only when they have been admitted to the pensionable establishment will they become eligible for membership of HMOCS.".
The statement
3. I have the following comments:
Para 3, after first sentence: separate provision was made for the judges etc., who, if I remeber correctly, were required to apply for membership of HMOCS by 1st October contingently on their application for transfer to the pensionable
service being approved. An appropriate
qualification needs to be made to reflect this.
Para 3, penultimate line: insert "from officers
in the service of Hong Kong" after "applications" ✓ Paras 5(1), line 4 and 5(11), line 4: substitute "as pensionable service" for "towards payments". Para 6: add at the end "under Hong Kong Pensions
=
- 3 -
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.