TNAG-2417-FCO40-3519-Hong-Kong-Her-Majesty-s-Overseas-Civil-Service-(HMOCS)-poli-1992 — Page 184

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

to reconcile with our commitments under the Joint

Declaration to work for Hong Kong's prosperity and stability

and for a smooth transition in 1997. Local officers, who

have shown the same loyalty to the Crown, would react angrily to a scheme which led to an expatriate exodus in 1997, leaving them alone to face the change of sovereignty. It could be difficult to explain to Parliament why we were prepared to commit up to £150 million on a group of civil servants who are already well paid by UK standards and given the assurances about security of pensions in the Joint Declaration. Departments are agreed that this option should be ruled out as being too expensive, and undermining the

assurances in the Joint Declaration and our objective of

encouraging HMOCS officers to stay.

FCO/ODA Scheme

10. This would fall well short of what HMOCS members are

expecting. They would in particular be strongly opposed to

a safeguard rate of, say, $16 to £1. But it would give them a degree of certainty that their pensions would not become

worthless even if the Hong Kong dollar collapsed. The costs

of the scheme cannot be predicted they could be zero if

the Hong Kong dollar stayed stronger than $16 to £1, or they

could amount to several hundred million pounds if it became

worthless. While the scheme would be divisive to a certain

extent in the Civil Service, the Governor is satisfied that

it should be possible to contain this by pointing out that HMG were paying, pursuant to their past undertakings to HMOCS members. Departments differ on whether HMG should be prepared to take on a contingent liability of this kind. The Treasury argue that HMG should not do so unless they simultaneously received assets from Hong Kong to pay for it. FCO/ODA strongly believe that this scheme is the minimum which should be offered, given HMG's commitment to HMOCS officers, and that it would be defensible in Parliament as striking a fair balance between the interests of HMOCs officers, the interests of the taxpayer and wider British

NFJABA/5

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.