TNAG-2390-FCO40-3472-Extradition-from-the-UK-to-Hong-Kong-case-of-Lorrain-Esme-Os-1991 — Page 55

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

A

!

B

C

D

E

F

LL

G

H

That group

BMFL to companies within the Carrian Group.

suffered a liquidity crisis in 1982 and is now in liquidation.

The Carrian Group companies were controlled by a Mr. George

Tan, who is Chinese.

The amounts advanced by BMFL to the Carrian Group and

which give rise to the charges are said to amount to something

like US$ 800 million. In very general terms the Government

of Hong Kong's case is that these advances were made

dishonestly. This is denied by Mr. Osman.

Having stated what I have about the background to the

extradition proceedings, it will be appreciated that the fact

that the habeas corpus number 1 application took a substantial

period of time and involved complex issues, again, in no way

reflects adversely upon Mr. Osman.

On 30th March 1988 his application number 1 was refused.

That led to a petition for leave to appeal to the House of

Lords. That petition was dismissed by the House of Lords on

14th July 1988. Before that decision was announced by the

House of Lords on 8th June 1988 habeas corpus number 2 was

made by Mr. Osman. This application was based on a number of

grounds, including that he was entitled to diplomatic

immunity, the committal was defective because it was

ultimately based on a Hong Kong warrant which was invalid and

the committal was based on evidence which had been obtained

from Malaya improperly.

On 21st December 1988 this court refused habeas corpus

14

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.