THREE
Page four/Corruption.
You will note that I have not mentioned the guilt or innocence
of Mr.Osman.
It is for the law officers to decide whether the interests of public
justice are served when, each time the prosecutor is required,he
is dragged from the cells, in chains, to the court, where the chief
witness if a self confessed criminal and in which the source of
the biased evidence is implicated in bribe taking and murder.
It is also for the law officers to decide whether the courts acted
lawfully in granting a PIIC to the cable I attach. As far as I am
concerned this amounts to the suppression of key evidence, but the
cable was in the public domain under EP privilage before the PII
grant, and the PIIC has no effect outside the courts.
I have consulted a leading European state prosecutor who knows the
case and he points out that the final legal authority for the
clearance of the loans and the transfer of the currency from KL to
HK, was Razaleigh. This is known to the HK authorities.
I hope you will act, immediately, to clear up this mess.
ahm
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.