TNAG-2390-FCO40-3472-Extradition-from-the-UK-to-Hong-Kong-case-of-Lorrain-Esme-Os-1991 — Page 14

01.02.90

05.02.90

28.03.90 to 30.03.90

10.04.90

20.06.90

26.07.90

14.11.90

12.12.90

House of Lords refuse leave to petition in UK2 and UK3

Osman files Habeas Corpus No 4

Osman applies to magistrate in Hong Kong for issue of a subpoena under section 104 of Magistrate's Ordinance to Attorney General to produce documents. The subpoena is issued and AG applies to set aside the Court's order. Hearing adjourned sine die to await discovery proceedings in the United Kingdom.

Osman appeals to Supreme Court of Malaysia in respect of the decision of 06.01.90

Osman applies for summons for discovery in respect of his fourth application for habeas corpus.

The Divisional Court reject the application for discovery on grounds other than public interest immunity.

The House of Lords reject Osman's petition for leave to appeal against the Divisional Court's decision of 20 June 1990.

Further application for discovery rejected by the Divisional Court.

The Divisional Court delivers judgment in UK4 rejecting Osman's claims and declares his application to be an abuse of process and contravention of statute.

02/3

UK4

HK3

M6

UK4

UK4

UK4

UK4

11.01.91

The Divisional Court refuses Osman's application for leave to appeal to the House of Lords.

UK4

14.01.91

The European Commission declares Osman's application to be inadmissible.

KR2

24.01.91

Osman petitions the House of Lords for leave to appeal.

UK4

27.02.91

House of Lords rejects Osman's petition UK5 for leave to appeal. Osman applies for judicial review and Habeas corpus 5.