the conclusion that we attach more importance to preventing its
disclosure than we actually do.
↑
10 This new wave of correspondence presumably reflects
Cahill's frustration at our refusal to be drawn. The allegations he
makes are all familiar, and most have been heard and rejected during
the course of Osman's five habeas corpus applications. We should
not allow ourselves to be intimidated by the sheer weight of
Cahill's current correspondence into making any substantive comment, especially as Cahill has no locus standi in the Osman case.
D H Colvin
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.