TNAG-2389-FCO40-3471-Extradition-from-the-UK-to-Hong-Kong-case-of-Lorrain-Esme-Os-1991 — Page 60

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

-6-

C

16.

BBMB selected from

Without objection, BBMB complied with the Order. what would have been a universe of hundreds of thousands of documents which, in the exercise of its discretion, it had independently determined within the categories in the 1986 Order.

and Crown Counsel Allison, a Chambers, inspected these documents.

Barrister

to fall

Thereafter, a Mr Clifford Howard

from the

General's HK Attorney At the conclusion of his inspection, he

signed a declaration dated 2and December 1986 (pages 41-290, "AK 1").

17.

Mr

-

Allison states at paragraph 2 (page 42, "AK 1") that he was attaching as exhibit "CHA 1" a schedule of "all the documents I have perused It will be noted from "CHA 1" pursuant to the 4th November 1986 order". (pages 44-260 "AK 1") that BBMB had selected 5,439 documents and/or files in Exhibit "CHA compliance with the Order, which Mr Allison carefully itemised. 2" (pages 261-273, "AK 1") was a schedule listing documents then in evidence before the UK Court. Mr Allison had examined the originals against copies used in these proceedings and the results of his inspection (i.e. if the found additional pages to a document) were indicated in the 5th and 6th columns of that schedule. Exhibit "CHA 3" (pages 274-290, "AK 1") contained additional documents that Mr Allison considered to be material to the case. It should be

documents produced

produced by Mr. mentioned that a substantial portion of those Allison were heavily censored extracts, including Board minutes as had previously complained.

to which I

C

MY SUBSEQUENT REQUESTS FOR INSPECTION.

18.

Paragraph 6 of the Krishnan Affidavit refers to the correspondence between Messrs Boase and Cohen and BBMB since early 1989 in respect of my BBMB stated in their letters of 28ti request to inspect certain documents.

March 1989 and 31st July 1990 (pages 29-30 and 38-39 respectively, "AK 1" that Bank Negara had consented to my request for inspection, on the conditio that it was limited to the documents relating to the extradition which ha I therefor earlier been made available to the HK Attorney General's office. had every expectation that I could inspect the documents listed in "CHA

1".

19.

On

inspection,

documents.

10th September 1990, the

Cohen Mr

attended

lle

was

the date agreed by the parties for "CHA office to

the inspect BBMB's

BBMB leg informed by Na'imah bte Khalid, Manager of

t!

33

Page 60Page 61

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.