C
-2-
in
Bank documents advisers of
the possession of
that the charges ("BBMB"). It will be recalled
legal inspection by my Bumiputra Malaysia Berhad
a result of my position as non-executive Director which I am facing arise as
of the particular issue In the context of BBMB and its subsidiary, BMFL. which I raise below, it is appropriate for me to state at the outset that it me with the filed which
the initial complaints against was BBMB/BMFL Independent Commission Against Corruption ("ICAC") in Hong Kong leading to my prosecution by the HK Government and my extradition from the UK. AS
were
a result
of those complaints, and the documents which BBMB initially made available to the ICAC, the case alleged against me is that the acts complained of carried out unilaterally by the Board of Directors of BMFL, and significantly for the purposes of the matters which I set out below, without the authority or knowledge of the Board or shareholders of BBMB. As I stated in paragraph 18 to this allegation that of my First Affirmation, it is my belief and my answer various matters of which complaint was made by BBMB against me were authorised at the highest level and approved by the Executive Chairman and Directors of BBMB. The various positions taken by BBMB in relation to the matters I set out below, must therefore be considered in that context, i.e. BBMB is my accuser in circumstances where the question of its own knowledge and approval of the acts complained of is at issue.
3.
Anad Krishnan dated 24t I crave leave to refer to the Affidavit of October 1990 together with exhibits "AK 1" and "AK 2" which have been filed i In paragraph 9 of his Affidavit the proceedings ("the Krishnan Affidavit").
}
Mr Krishnan explains that approximately 64% (or 3,480) of documents which BBM Court Order of 9th October 1990 to make available for r was required by a
the HK Government £‹ inspection (and which documents they made available to
my inspection. are no longer available for its inspection in 1986)
the relevant departments Officer of BBMB that Krishnan was advised by an BBMB had been requested to search for documents but, given the years since t HK inspection in 1986 only the remaining 36% could be found. that during the intervening years, some of the documents had been taken various departments and were missing (paragraph 6, Krishnan Affidavit).
was confirmed by BBMB in its letter da' unavailability of these documents 19th October 1990 (pages 23-24, "AK 2").
It was explain
ག
29
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.