TNAG-2389-FCO40-3471-Extradition-from-the-UK-to-Hong-Kong-case-of-Lorrain-Esme-Os-1991 — Page 10

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

COLLECTION OF OVERSEAS EVIDENCE

Collection of Malaysian Evidence

12. On 10 June 1991, Leading Counsel for the Hong Kong Government

Magistrate Sinclair in Hong Kong that the Crown was

informed

"not in the position to comply with

the

an

in

still, as at that date,

requirements of the Complex Commercial Crimes Ordinance upon

application for transfer to the High Court nor, alternatively,

provide the material required by section 80A (4) for committal

the BMFL case. ("LEO 1, page 1) This means that, despite the

lapse of time as aforesaid, the Hong Kong Government has failed

collect essential evidence upon which it admits its

is based ("LEO

to

prosecution

1", pages 2-3).

13. The history of the Malaysian evidence collecting exercise is

as follows:-

ex

the

(1) On 11th December 1985, the Hong Kong government made an

parte

Court application before Master Betts of the High

of

Hong Kong for an order that a Letter of Request be issued to

High Court of Malaysia ("the 1985 Letter of Request") for

collecting evidence in Malaysia. Pursuant to the 1985 Letter of

Request, the Hong Kong Government obtained depositions from 44

witnesses. It also obtained voluntary statements from Tan Sri

Kamarul

the

Ariffin ("Ariffin") and Nawawi Mat Awin ("Nawawi"),

Chairmen of Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Berhad ("BBMB"), the parent

8

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.