TNAG-2388-FCO40-3470-Extradition-from-the-UK-to-Hong-Kong-case-of-Lorrain-Esme-Os-1991 — Page 63

grounds of

relevance

rather thom

P.I.I.

3. P for the

substantive

heaving of

-the

fourth haben

сохорено,

the

Foo

mored

to

strike

ant

reference

to the

nin2

documents

on

the

grounds that they

were

subject to PII.

and

irrelevant. In

а

judgment

F

14 November 1990, the

Divisional

Court (Mann

(Mann LJ and

motion

both

on

basis

that

the

Court

by the

estoppel.

the

question of

4. Telegram No 2874

in June 1990 so that there

ivas

me

J

"The nine"

documents for which

P.1.1.

ivas

asserted

by

Francis Manda's certificate of 12 June

1990

It is

listed

A)

No. 50

in

The

Schedule

to that

•

J

P. II. and

Garland I) allowed the

on

The benis

of relevance

had

been

decided

was

an issue

Certificate.

5.1

enclose

* 30 March 1991

i) Letter / from Cahill

second

to

Sir Arthur Watts (my copy enclosing two

pages of the telegram)

1) Bundle containing letter of 13 March

Sir Rúbin Butter

iii) Bundle

containing

to

Mrs

iv) FW

letter

1991

1991 from Cahill to

if 28 January 1991 from Cahill

Rita Fan (which refers to Cahill's "book and documentary

Notice of

Motion

Affidavit of Nizilas Ash

Exhibit

12 June 1990

NA! - P.I.I. Certificate and Flesgutt

v) judgment of the Divisional Count, 20 June 1940 Leggatt LJ and Nṣton J)

vs) Judgment of

...

(Mann LJ and

the

Dirksional

Garland J)

Court

14 November 1710

C

")