TNAG-2388-FCO40-3470-Extradition-from-the-UK-to-Hong-Kong-case-of-Lorrain-Esme-Os-1991 — Page 5

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

1.

Mr Morris

HK TV

OSMAN: HABEAS CORPUS No s

Reference

I refer to the letter from Carolyn Martin of Cliffard Chance to Mr Pand of 1st May. My comments are as follows:

2: A (a) the content of Article 8 in the 1988,

1989 and 1990 texts of the BL is identical

in the Chinese texts, which are the only

authentic anes

The English translations of the

pra 1990 fiñal text are

1988 draft and the

abo identical.

The English trandation of the

1989 dragt differs slightly in that it says

"

to

those that are inconsistent with "

an

any difference of tranflation

that contravene". This is a

on the meaning,

been better to

It

amplify

andy

apposed

and has no

effect

might perhaps have

the statement in

the last sentence of para 3 of the Affidarit;

book if counsel wished to do so

explain it

we

3. (b) I

as above.

agree

·

that a

in court, he should

series of dots should

have been inserted to indicate the amitted

wards

and that

"

The" in the secard

sentence should read

"This".

CODE 18-77

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.