1.
Mr Morris
HK TV
OSMAN: HABEAS CORPUS No s
Reference
I refer to the letter from Carolyn Martin of Cliffard Chance to Mr Pand of 1st May. My comments are as follows:
2: A (a) the content of Article 8 in the 1988,
1989 and 1990 texts of the BL is identical
in the Chinese texts, which are the only
authentic anes
The English translations of the
pra 1990 fiñal text are
1988 draft and the
abo identical.
The English trandation of the
1989 dragt differs slightly in that it says
"
to
those that are inconsistent with "
an
any difference of tranflation
that contravene". This is a
on the meaning,
been better to
It
amplify
andy
apposed
and has no
effect
might perhaps have
the statement in
る
the last sentence of para 3 of the Affidarit;
book if counsel wished to do so
explain it
we
3. (b) I
as above.
agree
·
that a
in court, he should
series of dots should
have been inserted to indicate the amitted
wards
and that
"
The" in the secard
sentence should read
"This".
CODE 18-77
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.