PAGE FOUR XBGR2057 PROTECTED
OF NATIONAL VS INTL JURISPRUDENCE, AND - ON MORE
-MUNDANE LEVEL NOTED THAT CDN SPEAKERS COULD EASILY
INCLUDE CDN CONNECTION IN TITLES OF THEIR REMARKS. WE
BELIEVE THAT CONFERENCE DESIGN WILL ALLOW US TO
MAINTAIN HIGH CDN PROFILE IN CONFERENCE.
6.WE WERE TOLD THAT UNIV HAD INVITED ED BROADBENT BUT
HAD NOT/NOT YET RECEIVED A REPLY. WE UNDERTOOK TO GO
THROUGH OUR CHANNELS TO GET EARLY READING ON HIS
AVAILABILITY. YOU ARE CORRECT IN ASSUMPTION THAT
ORGANIZERS HAD BROADBENT DOWN AS ALTERNATIVE TO SPEAK
IN SESSION III: IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT, BUT
INTENTION WAS NOT/NOT FOR HIM TO SPEAK ON AUSTRALIAN
EXPERIENCE BUT RATHER CDN. HOWEVER, AFTER FURTHER
DISCUSSION, WE AGREED THAT IT WAS NOT/NOT APPROPRIATE
FOR BROADBENT TO SPEAK TO THIS SUBJECT. HE WILL NOT/NOT
JECT.
BE RETAINED AS AN ALTERNATE FOR THIS SEGMENT OF
PROGRAMME. PLS CONVEY THIS TO HIS OFFICE IN CASE THIS
A SPECT OF INVITATION RAISED DOUBTS ABOUT WHETHER OR
NOT/NOT HE WOULD ACCEPT.
7.FOR YOUR INFO WE ARE PURSUING THROUGH RCMP CHANNELS
POSSIBILITY OF HAVING SENIOR LEGAL MEMBER OF
RCMP/SOLGEN DEPT COME TO SPEAK ON TOPIC OF BILL OF
RIGHTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT.IDEA ORIGINATES IN
...5
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.