Ms Major
HKD
Bill of Rights
One
Tel
&
Reference
HKC 241/5
10 MAY 1991
: Hle Tel Nos: 1378, 9379
the probleme
3.9
I have with these lels
I
and the legal paper is that HKG have
not set out the basis on which the variour
ред
38
police options are being considered (eg para 2 of разгор Tel 1378 givel
no reasons for their preferred approach), Nor does the legal paper indicate that the kind of research which I would consider necessary has been done- eg. study of the scope of application of Bills of
its in other common law jurisdictions,
Rights
In
a
number of comtries
The U.5 and
India for example - there is voluminous case
law
the definition
"all other authorities"
Them
such expressions as
#1
the state" and
"which I would expect
to have taken into account. No doubt the
Canadian experience
It is
clear from the
is also relevant.
enomous volume of
c
care
litigation in these countries that very great.
to be taken in the draughing of their Clause 7, and without the benefit of the
neede
new
necessay research, this is not a which hasty legal advice
adrice can, or
on
point a
ought,
to
CODE 18-77
be giver.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.