TNAG-2325-FCO40-3369-Hong-Kong-Bill-of-Rights-policy-1991 — Page 167

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

061 2

MDHOAN 1285

APPROPRIATE TO KEEP THE REFERENCE TO 'BY MEANS OF A SINGLE LEGISLATIVE MEASURE'. THE SIMPLE DELETION OF THOSE WORDS WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE TO US BUT YOU MAY HAVE IDEAS FOR ALTERNATIVE WORDING. THIS ALSO RAISES THE DIFFICULT QUESTION OF HOW INTER-CITIZEN RIGHTS ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY LAW WHERE THIS IS REQUIRED BY THE COVENANT BUT NOT YET COVERED BY EXISTING LAW. WE ENTIRELY TAKE UKREP JLG'S POINT THAT FURTHER LEGISLATION WOULD GIVE RISE TO DIFFICULTIES WITH THE CHINESE. COULD YOU ENVISAGE ENACTING FURTHER LEGISLATION WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE ICCPR (EG ON DISCRIMINATION AND PRIVACY). WE SHOULD BE GRATEFUL TO KNOW YOUR FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THIS POINT.

3.

IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO SEE THE OTHER UNRELATED AMENDMENTS REFERRED TO IN PARA 4 OF FIRST TUR. IF THERE IS STILL SCOPE FOR MINOR AMENDMENTS, OUR LEGAL ADVISERS SUGGEST THAT YOU MIGHT CONSIDER ADJUSTMENT TO CLAUSE 6 TO MAKE CLEAR THAT ONLY INDIVIDUAL (NOT LEGAL PERSONS) CAN INVOKE THE BILL OF RIGHTS. THE ICCPR CLEARLY CONFERS RIGHTS ONLY ON INDIVIDUALS. THE ECHR ON THE OTHER HAND APPLIES ALSO TO LEGAL PERSONS. THERE COULD THEREFORE BE SCOPE FOR CONFUSION, ESPECIALLY IN LOWER COURTS, UNLESS THIS IS CLARIFIED.

4. FINALLY, WE SHOULD BE GRATEFUL TO KNOW WHETHER YOU STILL INTEND TO PUT THIS TO EXCO ON 15 APRIL AND WHETHER YOU ENVISAGE HAVING MINISTERS' VIEWS BEFORE EXCO CONSIDER.

HURD

YYYY

ΜΑΙΝ

61

.HONG KONG AGREEMENT

. (RESTRICTED)

LIMITED

HKD

HD/FED

NEWS D

PLANNERS

ADDITIONAL

2

MS BARRETT LEG ADV

DISTRIBUTION

63

PUSD

RAD

PS/LORD CAITHNESS

PS/MR LENNOX-BOYD

SIR J COLES

MR BURNS

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.