CONFIDENTIAL
===
The IPPR draft clause provides that the "Bill of Rights
applies to any act or omission by or on behalf of any
person or body (including the Crown) in the performance of
any public function". It may be noted that Anthony Lester,
Q.C. was one of the authors of this paper.
11.
The advantages of this approach are: it is
consistent with the latest developments in administrative
law; it concentrates on the character of an action and not
on the formal status of the actor; and it is more likely to
be consistent with the international obligation
12.
The disadvantage of the approach is that it does not provide a high degree of certainty as to what hodies
are in fact bound by the BOR and there may be some concern
in the business sector that franchise holdera (e.g. China Motor Bus Co. or the broadcasting corporations) may he
caught by the BOR. Furthermore, some bodies may be bound by
the HOR for some purposes but not for others.
Option 5: Statutory Bodies
13.
The BOR could contain a clause which defined
public bodies by reference to their legal status under the
law. This would mean including all bodies established by
Ordinance.
14.
The advantage of this approach is that it is a
certain measure and bodies would know whether they were
bound
CONRDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.