Rights Laws held at Bangalore,
India in February 1988.46
The collected judges from Commonwealth countries, and from
the United States, drew attention to the development of human
rights jurisprudence around the international statements of
human rights contained in
in human rights instruments. They
pointed out that some of
these rights had passed into
international customary law. In many Commonwealth countries,
with established bills of rights, the commonality of the
principles enshrined in international and national laws meant
that judges could, in their Own domestic decision-making,
call upon judicial
judicial decisions and learned commentaries in
other jurisdictions for the purpose of performing their daily
tasks. The essence of the Bangalore Principles can, be
found in the following statements:
"7.
8.
-
It is within the proper nature of the judicial process and well-established judicial functions for national courts to have regard to international obligations which a country undertakes whether or not they have been incorporated into basic law
for the purpose of removing ambiguity or uncertainty from national constitutions, legislation or common law.
However, where national law is clear and inconsistent with the international obligations of the State concerned, in common law countries the national court is obliged to give effect to national law. In such cases a court should draw such inconsistency to the attention of the appropriate authorities
the supremacy of national law in no way mitigates a breach of an international legal obligation which is undertaken by a country.
"
since
The judges at Bangalore called attention to the need to
promote the availability
of international human rights
jurisprudence. This is something which the Commonwealth
Secretariat and other bodies have set about doing.
-
- 20 -
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.