TNAG-2318-FCO40-3362-Petitions-from-members-of-the-public-regarding-Hong-Kong-1991 — Page 9

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

4. You also asked about the different types of disciplinary awards. As can be seen from flag N (Prison Rule 254 flagged), these range from reprimand and severe reprimand (which freeze an officers promotion for between 1 to 5 years), to a fine of an amount no more than one month's salary, demotion or compulsory retirement. Mr Hung was therefore given one of the least significant punishments.

5. In short, I continue to recommend that it would be appropriate to deal with this case without reference to the

Secretary of State or the Palace.

6.

For completeness I now attach the papers sent to me by the Hong Kong Government on this case, for your further

consideration.

These are as follows:-

D

E

i) Mr Hung's petition to the Governor of 9 May; Comments of the Commissioner of Correctional Services Department (CSD); the conclusions of Civil Service Branch on the

case (CSB); Letter denying the petition from Mr Eason, CSB of 31 May 1988.

ii) A further representation to the Governor by Mr Hung of 6 June 1988 (enclosing memos to demonstrate his

competence), Comments of the Commissioner of CSD; Comments of CSB and a letter of reply to Mr Hung of

28 June 1988.

F

iii) Letter of 18 January 1990 from Hong Kong Government forwarding Mr Hung's petition to the Secretary of State; Background brief on the case sent to the Governor; Recommendation that petition be forwarded to the

Secretary of State with advice that it be denied;

Governor's approval of the recommendation.

SALAAU/2

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.