TNAG-2307-FCO40-3343-UK-inward-investment-in-Hong-Kong-1991 — Page 72

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

6. What we are now proposing is a more realistic definition

of what the practice should be, while continuing to highlight the political sensitivities involved. It is

invisaged that in future, government-funded regional

development organisations would be free to pursue normal

promotional activities such as mounting inward investment

exhibitions, arranging seminars, holding receptions and

placing advertisements in the local press, provided that

they take care to avoid any political overtones and consult

the IBB in advance about their promotional initiatives. As

far as Ministerial visits are concerned, each case would

have to be judged on its merits. But it is likely that we

would continue to recommend that Cabinet Ministers should

not get involved in high-profile inward investment

activities.

Argument

The case for change

Since the original guidelines were drawn up in 1985, the situation has changed in a number of ways:

7.

(a) The Hong Kong Government have indicated that they no

longer see any objection to normal promotional activities

provided care is taken to avoid giving the impression of

seeking to exploit concerns in the territory about the

transfer of soverignty in 1997.

(b) There has been a sharp increase in investment flows both

in and out of Hong Kong, but relatively little of the

outward investment has come to the UK. A number of other

countries, including some of our EC partners, have been

making vigorous efforts to attract this investment. Our

self-imposed restrictions have therefore placed us at an increasing disadvantage.

CC3ABW/3

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.