TNAG-2285-FCO40-3286-Cooperation-between-Hong-Kong-and-China-on-criminal-matters-1991 — Page 46

CONFIDENTIAL

HMG's International

circumstances

in similar

Our legal advisers hatconsidered, if we were to allow

5.

Hong Kong to prov.73.

we would

gions. Their

i t

atlow. -yai

in breach of any 10:

conclusion is that if the assistarce provided is strictly

is unlikely to

limited in the Waly

result in breaches or international legal obligations by the

UK. I should be

difference betweel.

ence and the

extradition of a suspect to a country. In the latter case the person is, chr

protected-by-our-la-sand whebever conventions we have-

entered into.

6.

اتك

CL

The Home Secretary is responsible for deciding what action to take in mlakang

implementation of

J

Followiry the

national

Cooperation) Act 1990, a Central Authority, with an FCO

لا لا

seconde, has been

sice to consider

тал

80

C

requests for mutua.

Egal di po bando.

general policy

of The Here Office is that the "ossibility of the death

penalty being cone

sometic boy ch

the provision of evidence. But such cases and any other reasons for pulls..

Home Office Ministers and t: the 200

lenced t;

لا لا

7. The UK itself

information reques

an

if a sinİADE C

the

An arose

involving China or other furiadictions, which we did not have

IN whose leger system

CAV

were

full faith at 17 uten a prosecutios w

ki

o take place in, say, the US however, our attitude would probably be different.. These i pes of ca tes

there is one currently in play wn me finiial

ne sinila. ~ JGrat ons apply. Moroccan national, wanted for murder in this country, has

A

ROFATC/3

ENTTAT.

Cil