TNAG-2258-FCO40-3254-Hong-Kong-Port-and-Airport-Development-Strategy-(PADS)-Brit-1991 — Page 81

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

From:

Sir David Wilson GCMG

香港總督府

GOVERNMENT HOUSE HONG KONG

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

25 March 1991-

Jestroy after

090/3

Probably, in the usual way of the press, you are

being quoted out of context in the attached Sunday Telegraph article. But I was sorry to see them making use of you to suggest that contracts are pushed in a particular direction for political reasons.

For what it is worth, I am not aware of any US Government support for either the Bechtel or the Morgan Stanley bid. Certainly no suggestion whatsoever of them trying to play it tough. The only occasion on which I have ever been lobbied at a high level by the Americans was Mosbacher giving a push to US West in the cable bid.

He caused They come from his home state. acute embarrassment to the local Consulate-General by telephoning me.

For my part I gave strict instructions that his lobbying should be disregarded - it should weigh neither in favour of, nor against, US West. In fact, largely because of the indirect effect of fallout from 4 June, the consortium including US West got the franchise. They, or their partners, then made a mess of it.

Peter W Heap Esq CMG

Senior British Trade Commissioner

Hong Kong

Governor

е

ev

d

ཆ་བ་ ་

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.