TNAG-2238-FCO40-3217-Future-of-Hong-Kong-Royal-Navy-presence-1991 — Page 113

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

I

SECRET

POINTS TO MAKE BY PUS WITH SIR MICHAEL QUINLAN : ROYAL NAVAL

PRESENCE AFLOAT IN HONG KONG

[Flag B]

[[ Flag E]

-

Greatly concerned that MOD and HKG have been unable to reach agreement on how to finance the cost of retaining the

Royal Naval patrol boats in Hong Kong after 1992. Your Sir M. Quinlan's

latest letter leaves very little scope for compromise.

Do not underestimate MOD's budgetary difficulties. But

there are strategic issues at stake for HMG.

on

The problems facing the Governor are very real. Witness

the major political effort he has had to make to secure the voluntary contribution of £15 million to the Gulf War, which

Hong Kong has announced today 18 February}. We have plenty of allies in Hong Kong. But memories of past battles over

defence cost sharing remain fresh.

-

Although this contribution is given with certain strings

(for logistics, medical, humanitarian and other support), you are getting an unlooked-for windfall of twice the cost to you of the patrol craft over five years. Surely it is possible for you to take some account of this and let the

Hong Kong Government off the hook.

-

The current Defence Costs Agreement (DCA) runs for ten years (rather than the five in the past) precisely because all concerned wanted to avoid further bruising negotiations

in the run-up to 1997. Governor has bent over backwards to find ways to accommodate MOD concerns yet retain the Royal

Navy presence. But his local imperative is not to have to call in question the DCA (which is why your latest idea will

not work). Most regrettable if every time there are any

A16ABN/1

SECRET

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.