TNAG-2236-FCO40-3215-Hong-Kong-and-China-subversion-and-student-demonstrations-1991 — Page 218

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

RESTRICTED

FM HONG KONG

TO PRIORITY FCO

TELNO 286

Siberania

RESTRICTED

Stone Banker

Mr Stone

entered?

2

my

fice, if so.

Gary.

am Miss Major HKI)

HKI's typeopy

Where are those

Tel.

OF 25025OZ JANUARY 91

I think

INFO PRIORITY PEKING, UKREP JLG HONG KONG

AS

29.

161200

MDLIAN 3816

TOP COPY

NCNA PROTEST ABOUT HONG KONG ALLIANCE DEMONSTRATION

Q DIST?

НКВ 061

91

/

1. THE HONG KONG ALLIANCE ORGANISED A MARCH CULMINATING IN A CANDLELIGHT VIGIL ATTENDED BY ABOUT 3,000 PEOPLE OUTSIDE NCNA ON 24 JANUARY THEY WERE DEMONSTRATING ABOUT THE TRIAL OF WANG DAN IN PEKING. JI SHAOXIANG OF NCNA CALLED ON PA ON 25 JANUARY TO

PROTEST.

2. JI WENT OVER ALL THE USUAL GROUND ABOUT HKG AND THE RHKP CONNIVING WITH THE ALLIANCE, ABOUT DEMONSTRATIONS AIMED AT INCITING ANTI-CHINA SENTIMENTS NOT BEING IN ACCORD WITH THE

WILL OF MOST HONG KONG PEOPLE OR THE PROSPERITY AND STABILITY OF HONG KONG AND ABOUT SUCH INCIDENTS HARMING SINO-BRITISH

RELATIONS. HE REFERRED TO A PRESS REPORT THAT THE ALLIANCE HAD ONLY INFORMED THE POLICE AND NOT OBTAINED A LICENCE, AND EXPRESSED NCNA'S UTMOST INDIGNATION AND REGRET OVER HKG BREAKING ITS PROMISE TO ENSURE THAT ALL SUCH DEMONSTRATIONS WERE WITHIN THE LAW. HE DEMANDED HKG TAKE MEASURES TO EFFECTIVELY STEM SUCH

ACTIVITIES BY THE ALLIANCE.

3. EHRMAN SAID THAT IT WAS CERTAINLY NOT THE CASE THAT HKG OR RHKP HAD CONNIVED AT THIS OR OTHER DEMONSTRATIONS. THE POLICE WERE THERE TO ENFORCE THE LAW AND KEEP GOOD ORDER. THEY HAD ONCE AGAIN DONE SO, ENSURING THAT THE NOISE LEVELS FROM THE LOUDHAILERS WERE REDUCED AT 11.00 P.M. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOISE CONTROL ORDINANCE. THE DEMONSTRATORS HAD DISPERSED PEACEFULLY AT 11.05 P.M. AND THERE HAD BEEN NO UNTOWARD INCIDENTS. HE SAID THAT THE PRESS REPORT WAS MISTAKEN AS THE ORGANISERS HAD APPLIED FOR AND OBTAINED PERMITS BOTH FOR THE DEMONSTRATION AND FOR THE USE OF LOUDHAILERS. WE HAD NO INTENTION OF ALLOWING HONG KONG TO BECOME A BASE FOR SUBVERSION. BUT PEOPLE WERE FREE TO EXPRESS THEIR OPINIONS WITHIN THE LAW.

COMMENT

4. THERE WAS NOTHING NEW IN THIS PROTEST (EXCEPT FOR ONE

ENTERTAINING REFERENCE TO THE ALLIANCE INTERFERING WITH THE

1

PAGE

RESTRICTED

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.