have not taken on borond my supperton off deleting the oference to Article Gom correction with the Chief Justice (paragraph 52 & 9)), I see no point in repeating comments
2 miley
you have incorporated new points which doe
appear to be the
hot
of my time dany
to look at
2. I suggest deletup
~
core
1
Av
a waste
the same draft terce
the provision of from Your daft letter (ponagraph 1) from the secreting
ako think
think that
of State to the Governor. the form of the letter is not quite right.
The letter after all is from the Senetary I Sinte
to the Governor ( Article II of the herois Patent) & I think it mukhely that such a letter would end "Yours faithfully".
you
Compaert look for a pronoms precedent when by
the Jenretary of
to
Frate
the Gonever
J
copy
has that form.
uniten
5. Brooks 17/4
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.