PELTOP
353 177 0208
raght, an effect, to regulate Article Alv. No proviSION. IN
eny rirary ст subsidiary legislation
[
Brann
requiring
ilcations for appointment as a mayıstrate hai Leen
ttention.
rowern
appointment or Justices
his
The authority for the -verno: to Jeleyate
the Peace anc ci
ris out! to for opinions,
"agi tretes as well
Coth
zoniertes
posed
sna
1 of the
reirance:
kdinance.
Power
•
seri
rection.
Delive
Fron
interpretation an. General
contrar. Intention then appearing
Jose sections have no cirect appil
ather S
that
minute C:
the erfective SQUICI C1
stions
Clauses
or any
tion to
11 February
2, JOUUONDA
rot
else to
the suspended power
Article XIV, heen by paplan Jas
A
jelegat 10 fyat the appCIDE ent C:
01 Lue Peace the Chiet
ot wednoc. dry
reasonUL
-ne
Over
nd ex-officio
JusticeS
he BVIOUS selecate.
-
-oulu
20 FebrJary
•
fro
Justi
Both
Coula Re
સે
VICA
strongly neer argued that the
•
Commission cr.inance, enucteu or.
Jemonçtrate
contrary intent107.
cate, render the elevation さい the Chief
unreasonavle and unle.ful. HOW
Le
Governor upout â
Se
2s asked,
Cires LO Lencer acvice to She Pagisterial vacancy under section li it were contemplates that ne might have jeleyated or might delegate his power of appointment to another? In particular why
should the Chief Justice, Chairman. De required to aov; se the Governor on appointments me was himself to make by reason of the delegation of 11 Februar; 19747 Although a puzzling zeference to the Chief Justice in section 9 suggests that the draftsman may have been aware of the delegation in question the overall structure of the
ar'
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.