12-MAT-1391
DIPECTOR OF ADM.
853 877 0803
F.14
doctrinë
oreover, tne Corle
140 Application
poem advanced that the
concitions of settleg
the
constitutional government. In such circumstances orderly Feintenance of the rule of law required that litigante Lana in particular defendents in criminal cases)
udicial officers not properly
Deen suugested that
should not be tried by
appointed.
1
nau
ever
the Contiine
were applicable it would still not save the position wecause a ridden cefect zefect in .r. line's appoint:ent was not
the respondents to the Chius' as patent because It appeared in
s the public er
The defect
รี appoint:ent ~ the Chief Justice lather
aup! rations.
the
23
enu
than
The
overnor.
e pranespal conc.usions and findings
The
Summarisea
quuge' principal conclusions anu findings can
as follows:
1)
Jaylstrates
ere includes
21. the capiCSSION
ミリ
in Article XIV et
The whole civil
the
other public off
Letters fatell,
Service:
121
The
(د)
IN NIE Opinion
Occur
C the magistrates viainance reluted
solely to the number of magistrates ruguired
for the efficient acministration of justice.
AS to the Cur.ission that the whole scneme of
the Judicial Service Commission Ordinance,
Cap. 12 was quite inconsistent
Being
ہے
with inere
this
lauful delegation by the Governor to the Chief Justice to appoint magistrates, piece of local legislation enacted in 1974 could not we used to limit the ambit of
Article IV.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.