000
GUVERNMENT HOUSE
HUNG KUNG
4-29
8:40
CONFIDENTIAL
لن
PHGE ØS
(j) the
doctrine might apply, however, so as the prevent
defendants 10 cases already concluded before the
magistrate concerned (or indeed, other magistrates)
NOW raising the question of invalidily, but it
was unnecessary to decide the point.
3.
DOWELD
UL
Even though the amendments to Article XIV of the Letters
ratent approved by the Privy Council on 16 April, and any
additional amendments which on further consideration may De considered necessary, snouia provide all necessary Delegation, cure previously целессive
appointments and render unchallengable the official acts
of invalidly appointed public officers, there are aspects Cie juuyment wilen put in woudt the legal propriety of
long-standing Duministrative practices, in finding the
DY Life Governor LU сле слler Justice in 19/4
to be defective, the judge placed considerable weight on what ne described as the "casual manner" in which it was
done. However, he did not cite any authority to support
tn15 grouna for nis decision.
4.
allributing
woula be highly unsatisfactory and productive of much continuing uncertainty, 1 t the only guidance available to the Administration on this important point were to
remain a decision of a single judge. Furthermore, in
crucial significance lo the Governor's failure to cite expressly his powers under Article XIV
when making the delegation, we feel the judge has attached undue importance to matters of form rather than
substance.
therefore
reasons.
UIL
LU appeal Lne Judgment ΟΙ Kapian J was
taken principally for these, amongst other,
IL was considered essential that doubts on
matters of high constitutional importance with widespread implications for our administrative procedures should be authoritatively resolved at appellate level.
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.