TNAG-2218-FCO40-3186-Constitutional-development-in-Hong-Kong-Letters-Patent-and-R-1991 — Page 150

CONFIDENTIAL

暫。

167166

MDHIAN 8187

7. GRATEFUL TO KNOW WHETHER YOU WOULD ACCEPT THE POINT MADE IN PARA 6 OF HK TELNO 434.

DISSOLUTION OF LEGCO

8. WE HAVE NO DIFFICULTY.

GOVERNOR AS PRESIDENT

9. GRATEFUL FOR YOU VIEWS ON THE TEXT PROPOSED IN HK TELNO 734.

WAY FORWARD

10. GRATEFUL IF YOU COULD LET US HAVE A REVISED DRAFT BASED ON THE ABOVE COMMENTS A.S.A.P. SO THAT WE CAN GO TO EXCO ON 26 MARCH. THE PROBLEM WITH THE JUDICIAL REVIEW ON THE GOVERNOR'S POWER OF DELEGATION POINTS TO THE NEED TO HAVE TWO SEPARATE INSTRUMENTS COVERING THE ICCPR ENTRENCHMENT AND THE GOVERNOR'S POWER OF DELEGATION INDIVIDUALLY SO THAT THEY CAN COME INTO OPERATION INDEPENDENTLY. IF YOU ARE NOT IN FAVOUR OF THIS, WE SUGGEST THAT A MECHANISM BE BUILT INTO THE AMENDING LP TO ENABLE DIFFERENT PROVISIONS TO COMMENCE OPERATION BY DIFFERENT DATES.

FORD

YYYY

ΜΑΙΝ

61

DISTRIBUTION

63

.HONG KONG AGREEMENT

. (RESTRICTED)

LIMITED

HKD

HD/FED

NEWS D

PLANNERS

PUSD

RAD

PS/LORD CAITHNESS

PS/MR LENNOX-BOYD

MR MCLAREN

MR BURNS

ADDITIONAL

2

MS BARRETT LEGAL ADVISERS

MISS BROOKS LEGAL ADVISERS

4

NNNN

PAGE 3 CONFIDENTIAL

Page 150Page 151

Ms Brooks

Legal Advisers