?
2
THE PROBLEM OF 'UNGOVERNABILITY' IN THE TWILIGHT
OF COLONIAL RULE: THE CASE OF HONG KONG
Until the eruption of the 1997 issue, which spells the
scheduled termination of colonial rule, Britain had been able to
maintain stable and effective governance in Hong Kong. What is
most extraordinary is that colonial rule was not even disturbed
amid the feverish worldwide anti-colonial torrent in the
immediate aftermath of the Second World War. The tenacity and
endurance of colonial rule in Hong Kong can only partially be
attributed to the political ability and adaptability of the
colonial administrators.1 It is in fact a fortuitous
constellation of favorable conditions which have made effective
colonial governance possible, especially in the post-war period.
These conditions together have endowed the colonial government
with a decent degree of political legitimacy, making colonial
rule generally acceptable to the people of Hong Kong. The
'popularity' of colonial rule can be gauged by the fact that the
Hong Kong Chinese prefer it to rule by their socialist
motherland.
As it is an inalterable fact that China is going to resume
sovereignty over Hong Kong in 1997, the people of the territory
suddenly realize that their colonial masters are compelled to
quit the place in due course and will not be able to act as the
1 See for example Ian Scott, Political Change and the Crisis of Legitimacy in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989).
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.