CONFIDENTIA
2.
Governor. Under a secondment scheme, I would be responsible for
approving the firms which could participate, and allocating the
available places between them, and the scheme would be seen as
an HMG, rather than an HKG, scheme. I would much prefer to avoid
that.
consideration
is that my
involvement
A third
in the
selection process for the secondment scheme would widen the scope
for judicial review in the courts here.
Finally, and this is more a point for you, it seems very
likely that the removal of over 80% of the Hong Kong working
population from the main scheme will increase the Governor's
hostility towards the secondment scheme. He will be able to
claim, with justification, that the restructuring of his original
proposals will result in more than 60% of the assurances under
the General Allocation Scheme going to the business community.
Within that scheme, employees of British firms will in any case
have a modest advantage over the points system on the basis of
their British links: and he may argue that a further advantage
through a secondment scheme would be difficult to defend in Hong
Kong.
I recognise that we shall face criticism from British firms
if we abandon the scheme, particularly since it featured in your
announcement of 20 December, but I think we can point to the way
in which the General Allocation Scheme will favour employees of
British companies to counter that criticism. I hope that, on
balance, you will feel able to agree with my firm view that the
scheme should be abandoned.
CONFIDENTIAL !
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.