TNAG-2175-FCO40-3112-Hong-Kong-Bill-of-Rights-1990 — Page 29

جی

H.

presesor NT rights is not caught by the second Sentence. This would indicate that the letters Patent (20.2) should not come into operation until Ite BOR is enacted.

There is also an issur implicit in the first sentence. Doss the requirement to implement the ICCPR of itself invalidate laws which contain restritèns incompatibl with the ICCPR. So that the second sentence is unnecessary

un took it vieis When the Bt was bring drafted,

that the second paragraph of

• paragraph of Art 39 was necessary and 1 think it is highly desirable if only to demonstrate

what is the consequence of the first paragraph of that Article.

lude a

But I would not excluds

count coming

& the

view that I'e first paragraph of Art 39 and I's first

the

in 1/% Dyke's letter (& in all the

Sentence of the draft

crafts

b

wo have suggested) is enough. Howson, it would

morr

difficult

Is

k

cour & that conclusion if the