TNAG-2154-FCO40-3074-Human-rights-in-Hong-Kong-United-Nations-Committee-on-the-El-1990 — Page 44

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

ROUTINE

impact: we imagine extension of CEDAW would spark interest which

has not in the past been aroused by the ICCPR. And the

proposed Bill of Rights might contribute to this.)

5.

On balance therefore we think there is some scope for

extending ratification to Hong Kong subject to the existing

reservations and declarations in respect of other Dependent

Territories. But, before going down this path we need to look

carefully at the implications. Firstly are you able to assess

the likelihood of a challenge? Is there, for example, a

vociferous women's lobby in Hong Kong which is likely to pick up

this point and seek a decision as to whether your present Law and

policy is contrary to the ICCPR, CEDAW or Hong Kong's Bill of

Rights? Secondly we note from para 7 of TUR that you would be

prepared to amend your law and policy in this event.

Could you

#

give further details on how you would attempt to do this and what

the implications might be, bearing in mind that we shall have to

discuss with the Chinese the extension of CEDAW as a new IRO to

Hong Kong and they may well take the view that it is not entirely

consistent with the JD and the Basic Law.

6. We apologise for the delay in replying. But this is clearly

a complex issue. Grateful for your views in due course.

Hurd

YYYY

ΜΑΙΝ

LIMITED

HKD

UND

LEGAL ADVISERS

MR

MCLAREN

NNNN

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.