CONFIDENTIAL
HMOCS, stated that Members were entitled to expect that "in the event of premature retirement resulting from constitutional change, they will receive compensation from the government of the territory
concerned".
6.
The 1960 White Paper stated that the terms of future
compensation schemes should remain a matter to be settled in the
light or circumstances prevailing in each territory, but set out the broad principles that members of HMOCS should be entitled to retire
with compensation for the loss of a career under the protection of the Secreary of State, and that compensation schemes should provide an inducement to officers to continue to serve so long as their services were required. It also announced a scheme of financial assistance, including help with the cost of compensation, for dependent territories. Hong Kong, along with the Bahamas, Bermuda
and Brunei, was excluded from the scheme of financial assistance "at
least for the present". The relevant extracts are attached.
7.
Compensation schemes were normally introduced in two stages: a limited scheme, to cover compulsory retirement to faciliate the localisation of posts before independence; and a general scheme, offering HMOCS officials the option to retire at independence or later with immediate payment of pensions. Compensation for loss of
career and other factors was given on an actuarial basis. The compensation was available to all HMOCS officers, irrespective of
whether they stayed on or not. It was normally paid in several annual instalments and contained an inducement to stay on in that if the officer stayed on in employment, the compensation could be adjusted upwards.
8. The circumstances of Hong Kong are of course different from previous cases because the territory will not become independent. Furthermore the Joint Declaration on Hong Kong guarantees a
continuing career for serving officers on "terms no less favourable than before" (JD 72). But Ministers have stated publicly since the signature of the Joint Declaration on Hong Kong that the transfer of sovereignty in 1997 raises issues regarding HMOCS comparable to
WEDABH/3
CONFIDENTIAL
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.