1990-07-27 17:39
V
Non Pr
INFORMATION SERVICES DEPT
ا اليابانية
852 521 7725 P.07/13
OJA ODJ VOHU
罪
Pag. 2
Aside from that aspect of the charges, there is a
As Mr. FUNG
defence of "excuse" provided in section 4 itself.
has out it in his final submission. "an offence under Stie
lawful “authóřity or exouse!
I will go into the question of what would constitute
an "excusel later.
As stated earlier, the burden of proof lies with the
Prosecution.
So, before even considering whether there were
ke provided by Savviva 4wd
KE
evidence was against each of the Defendants.
F-,,
Because Mr. FUMG had mentioned Dé's case in his
flukk submission. I looked at the pridepoo against him firat.
I found that Mr. FUNG was perfectly right in his submission in relation to DO. In the Agreed Facts, there ip mathing connecting D6 with the use of loudhailers or with the collections
of donations on 16/2/90. There being no evidence whatsoever connecting D6 with those acta, Summonses Nos. 13 and 14 will be
dismissed.
The came emo be maid of Summonses Nos. 5 and 6. There
widenna ananasting 12 with the acts of using a loudbuiler
of
or the collection/donation in page 3 of Exh. P1.
Therefore these
2 summonsoo will also be dismissed.
. . . . ./3
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.