No.
Date
perhaps even being threatened..
Luxemburg or De How can unsubtanceated statements, made two admitted drug smugglers, who have already changed their statements once, be
by
presented to the court as evidence. When, firstly, my Secondly,
gauge
Jeeling of
not
instructions where
no chance to cross examine them on what they say! Secondly, as well as for the court to produce the witnesses in person, so as to
and to get the Jee their reactions, and to
whether ot "(and I stress "not") they are telling the truth.
their reactions, are E... About the contents of the statements; the two men.
the statements ; the two men continually contradict each other on their stories. they met. Who got there first, who bought plane tickels, how long they stared in Singa
even my name, (why would a
(why would a fellow Chinese keep) calling me by a European name, if he knew, as he claims, my. Chevese name). In fact the only thing they seem to agree on, as
in the photo is me, which I find totally
that the
Singapore+
Detson in
person
as I have never met these men.
gge Who
gave.
seem
ludicrous,
F. On top of all this, this statement was made in Chinese, them translated into Dutch (no name of translater) then into English (again
no translater named) then finally into the Thai language for the court. I'm sure you are familiar with the
the broken tellephone
telephone syndrome... or should
or should I say a" four language.
troken telephone"!
كه
After the court allowed this statement to be used. evidence against me, and my lawyer having no right to question it this was the last straw that frike my resolve. I could
See
8mm
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.