TNAG-1994-FCO40-2841-Hong-Kong-extradition-laws-1989 — Page 51

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

TOMARZ

BACKGROUND

CONFIDENTIAL

References:

A: 5 PQs from Alex Carlile MP answered on 18 May 1989.

B: PQS from Alex Carlile MP answered on 27 July 1988.

1. It is likely that this question relates to the case of Lorrain

Osman whose extradition to Hong Kong is being sought. Mr Smith has

recently written to both FCO and Home Office Ministers about various

aspects of the case. (Replies are still being processed). He had

not previously shown any interest in the case.

2.

Over the past three years however there has been a string of PQs

and Ministerial correspondence, both with the Home Office and the

FCO, initially couched in general terms, but then explicitly on the

Osman case. The bulk of the Parliamentary activity has been handled by Liberal/SLD MPs and peers.

3. The draft reply follows lines that have been used in earlier

correspondence. The Hong Kong Government and Legal Advisers have

been consulted.

The key point is that Hong Kong and China will have separate legal systems after 1997. It would be perfectly proper to make provision for the rendition of fugitive criminals from Hong

Kong to China where they are sought in China for separate offences.

We have yet to commence discussions on this subject with the Chinese

authorities. When we do, we shall seek to ensure that there are

appropriate limits on jurisdiction and safeguards comparable to

those which exist today under the Fugitive Offenders Act.

4. Osman is a wealthy Malaysian businessman who has been remanded

in custody at Pentonville Prison since December 1985 awaiting

extradition to Hong Kong. The Hong Kong Attorney-General is seeking

to prosecute Osman for large-scale fraud, bribery and corruption involving HK$1 billion, in the Bumiputra Bank affair. Osman has

been fighting extradition on a wide range of legal points, including a claim for diplomatic immuinity by virtue of his supposed appointment by the Liberian Government as their Ambassador-at-Large

to the EC. The Government have consistently rejected the claim for

immunity on the grounds that the notification of the appointment had

not been properly made. The Liberian authorities last year put in a

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.