TNAG-1987-FCO40-2820-Presentation-of-UK-policy-on-Hong-Kong-to-the-media-1989 — Page 36

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

F: HUMAN RIGHTS

1.

PROGRESS ON BILL OF RIGHTS?

Governor announced in his speech to LegCo on 11 October that a

Bill would be published for public consultation by the end of the

year and draft legislation introduced by JUly 1990.

Will enshrine fundamental rights and procedures currently enjoyed

in Hong Kong and will give clear effect in local law to relevant

provisions of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

Will continue after transfer of sovereignty. This means that if

anyone believes their civil or political rights, as defined in

Covenants, have been violated, they will be able to seek redress in

local Courts.

2. WHY WILL PROVISIONS OF COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL

RIGHTS NOT BE EMBODIED IN BILL OF RIGHTS?

Social and

The Provisions of International Covenant on Economic,

Cultural Rights are in form of objectives to be achieved

progressively. Generally speaking. they are not justiciable

ie rights which individuals could easily enforce in the courts.

For this reason, not well suited for inclusion in a Bill of

Rights designed to give right of direction action in courts.

Obiectives of Covenant will be implemented through existing

legislation and policies.

3.

HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN CHINA NULLIFY ATTEMPTS TO PROTECT

HUMAN RIGHTS IN HONG KONG

Can well understand this concern. But basic principle that lies

behind Joint Declaration is that Hong Kong should have its own laws

and its own systems quite separate from those of China. These

provisions fully reflected in draft Basic Law.

MAXAEL(3)

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.