TNAG-1983-FCO40-2816-Presentation-of-UK-policy-on-Hong-Kong-to-the-media-1989 — Page 125

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

N

DSR 11 (Revised)

DRAFT:

FROM:

minute/letter/teleletter/despatch/note

SECRETARY OF STATE

DEPARTMENT:

Wall Street Journal

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

TO:

Top Secret

Secret

Confidential

Restricted

Unclassified

PRIVACY MARKING

SUBJECT:

..In Confidence

HONG KONG

CAVEAT......

Enclosures-flag(s)...........

TEL. NO:

TYPE: Draft/Final 1+

Reference

TG1BBP

Your Reference

Copies to:

The author of your editorial of 24 January evidently

cares deeply about Hong Kong and its people. So do I.

That is why I found it particularly disturbing that he

should have shown such scant regard for the facts.

I played a leading role in the negotiations which

culminated in the signing of the Sino British Joint

Declaration on Hong Kong in 1984. I have continued to

attach the highest possible priority to the full and

faithful implementation of that agreement.

I must

therefore intervene to dispel the profound misconceptions

about Britain's role in Hong Kong.

The editorial makes a number of misleading

assertions about what the Joint Declaration says about

representative government in Hong Kong. It implies that

detailed, specific

we

are now reneging from/promises given in that document.

What are the fagte?

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.