TNAG-1973-FCO40-2806-Hong-Kong-Vietnamese-refugees-repatriation-1989 — Page 6

Mandatory Repatriation

We should be under no illusion that voluntary repatriation alone will be sufficient to get problem under control. Believe it has

always been accepted by those closely involved with problem that we would have to face prospect of mandatory repatriation in due course. The seriousness of the situation means that we will have to grasp

this difficult nettle now.

Recognise the difficulties but believe that we should aim to

achieve at ICIR a fixed timetabling mechanism for repatriation,

including a review of progress on repatriation 3 months after the

ICIR, with a deadline of 4-6 months after the ICIR for start of

phased repatriation.

Firm arrangements for repatriation of all non-refugees will send

the strongest possible signal. Most likely to have decisive deterrent effect on potential departures and encourage other

volunteers to come forward.

Mandatory repatriation would begin only after flow of volunteers had dried up.

alternatives

Mandatory repatriation is not an appealing prospect. But

abandonment of principle of first asylum, or indefinite detention of tens of thousands of people

-

-

even worse.

In any case, no question of sending anyone back without Vietnamese Government's agreement and undertaking to assure safety and good treatment of returnees.

Recognise that Vietnamese Government have so far rejected

mandatory repatriation. We all must press them to face their

international responsibilities and respond to the crisis in a way

which is commensurate to scale of problem.

JONAAP