TNAG-1968-FCO40-2801-Hong-Kong-illegal-immigrants-from-China--originally-Vietname-1989 — Page 14

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

CONFIDENTIAL

FM FCO

TO PRIORITY HONG KONG

TELNO 470

OF 02153OZ FEBRUARY 89

INFO PRIORITY PEKING

CONFIDENTIAL

TRANSFERRED

HKD 243/5

H

143064

MDLOAN 0925

YOUR TELNO 549 AND PEKING TELNO 254: ECVIIS AND VBPS

1.

WE ARE GENERALLY CONTENT WITH THE LINE WHICH YOU PROPOSE PEKING SHOULD TAKE WITH THE MFA. BUT BEFORE THEY DO SO, WE SHOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR CLARIFICATION OF POSITION ON THE FANG CHENG CASES (PARA 2C OF TUR).

2.

WE WELL RECALL OUR ATTEMPTS IN 1988 TO PERSUADE THE CHINESE TO ACCEPT THE RETURN OF SOME FANG CHENG CASES. WE ALSO RECALL CONCERN EXPRESSED BY UNHCR ABOUT CONDITIONS IN FANG CHENG. OUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE POSITION IS THAT THE CHINESE NEVER AGREED TO ACCEPT THE REPATRIATION OF THE 1988 FANG CHENG CASES AS THEY WERE NOT REFUGEES WHO HAD SETTLED ON THE MAINLAND (PEKING TELNO 626) AND THAT UNHCR DECIDED TO RESETTLE FROM HONG KONG ALL SUCH CASES TOGETHER WITH THE REMAINING CASES IN FANG CHENG ITSELF (YOUR TELNO 2755). IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO KNOW WHETHER YOU HAVE DISCUSSED THE LATEST CASES WITH UNHCR. WE WONDER WHETHER THEY ARE STILL CONCERNED ABOUT CONDITIONS IN FANG CHENG AND, IF SO WHETHER THEY WOULD WISH TO RESETTLE THE LATEST 22 CASES FROM HONG KONG, IN LINE WITH THEIR PREVIOUS DECISION.

3.

SUBJECT TO CLARIFICATION OF THE ABOVE POINTS, WE WOULD THEN NEED TO DECIDE WHETHER, AND IF SO HOW, TO COVER THE FANG CHENG CASES IN WHAT WE SAY TO THE CHINESE.

HOWE

YYYY

ΜΑΙΝ

93

DISTRIBUTION

99

.VIETNAMESE BOAT PEOPLE IN HK

LIMITED

HKD

SEAD

PS

PS/LORD GLENARTHUR

PS/MRS CHALKER

PS/MR PATTEN ODA

PAGE

1

CONFIDENTIAL

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.