Secretary of State expressed concern), we were not asked what our position was that being known - but whether we were maintaining it. We saw no alternative but to make clear that this still
an
A remained our issue of importance. We tried to strike the balance
between not overstating our objective, and having it reported that our resolve was weakening as a result of Chinese pressure.
5.
wtkeled?
Eter
& Mential
The Wiggham speech, made on 14 August, described the PLA presence in Hong Kong after as "a subject of great anxiety among the population". It went on to say that the question needed to be addressed as to whether there was a need for the PLA to be stationed in Hong Kong in time of peace. Wiggham said that he hoped to "contribute to the current discussion on the draft Basic Law."
6. His language seems carefully chosen. He does not, for instance; do more than ask questions; and makes clear that responsibility for
There drafting the Basic Law rests with the Chinese. To the non-expert
appears to be noth in the aye, it is impossible to sustain the Chinese charge that this is a violation of the Joint Declaration.
which could
7.
This charge was, however, made by the People's Daily on
21 August. Mr Maude responded on the BBC World Service the same day (manuscript attached).
8. The only element in
been made in
of
Tu
the
Yelech
mmment
Mr
Wiygham's
puthic
was
The
Chinese Love
not
Basic Lan
Declaration. puist.
ght not accurately
might
which had not previously
that cerai
accurately reflect the
parts
reflect the Joint picked up
havere
thank
JD K Grant
?
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.