TNAG-1917-FCO40-2721-Interdiction-of-Vietnamese-refugees-at-sea-1989 — Page 23

RG1AAV

DE 18-77

12

1.

2.

Mr Thorne

Mr

Brenton

RESTRICTED

HONG KONG AND FIRST ASYLUM

1

•

Reference..

/195.

Miss Kruist (HKD)

In convection-with

miner of today

VBP/bodź

dived so was postages

dhus we Torture Convenqui

duš

<

in paras

5+6 what I bool underlined. I helped

ہے۔

it!

Following Lord Glenarthur's first office meeting on pregeare Vietnamese Boat People, Mr Brenton asked whether HMG would be puré contravening any international obligations, particularly the appea

20 UN 1951 Convention on Refugees, if the Hong Kong Government withdrew first asylum. I have discussed this with Legal Advisers who are content with what follows. More careful consideration of the issues would however be necessary if the matter is taken any further.

2.

as

Neither the UN 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, nor the related UN 1987 Protocol, have been extended

Nor are to Hong Kong, and therefore they do not apply there. there any plans to extend these instruments to Hong Kong, was made clear in the reply to a recent PQ. Even if the Convention and/or Protocol had been extended to Hong Kong, however, it is noteworthy that there is no mention of the concept of "first asylum" in them.

-

3. It is however a feather in Hong Kong's cap that their screening procedures are consistent with the criteria laid down in these international instruments ie they apply the definition of a refugee as contained in them. The result is that Hong Kong is able to screen out some 90% of newly arrived Boat People as "economic migrants". Nevertheless, if Hong Kong were to withdraw first asylum, the new policy would not be consistent with Article 32 of the 1951 Convention, which provides that: "contracting states shall not expel a refugee lawfully in their territory

[and] shall allow

a refugee a reasonable period within which to seek legal admission into another country".

4

#

such

While this would not put the UK in breach of its legal obligations (the Convention not having been extended to Hong Kong), there would undoubtedly be a publicity price to pay the public outcry outside Hong Kong would be immediate. At this stage the HKG are airing the threat intermittently: the attached Hong Kong telno 1480 (para 2), eg, puts the threat in context at this stage.

5.

٧٠٨

It should also be pointed out that there are two other international Covenants particularly relevant in the context: the international Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. The former was extended to Hong Kong în the UK's ratification in 1976. The latter is due

19/5

ETAKEN SIETARIOS

RESTRICTED